Ultimate Direction Scott Jurek Ultra Vest quick overview:
- Usual full price: $124.94 USD
- Weight: 368 g with 2 UD bottles
- Cost per gram: $0.34 / g (w/ bottles)
- Pros: Light, High Capacity, Breathable, Versatile
- Cons: Durability, Protection
- Suitability: Ultra running and scrambling, but even short rando racing workouts.
- How we go it: Paid full price (disclosure notices)
Bottom line:
I paid full price and will happily pay it again to replace it when it is worn out. Make sure you chose the model that suits your purposes (AK, SJ, or PB) or get a combination.
Photos:
Product description and How we tested it:
The SJ ultra vest is the middle in a series of three running vest models from Ultimate Direction. The AK comes in as the smallest model designed mainly for racing (review coming soon). The SJ (subject of this review) is the middle-sized model for racing and long runs or scrambles. The PB is the largest capacity for long distance adventuring.
I tested the SJ pack over the Spring/Summer/Fall 2013 running season which included some long races (Squamish 50k) and some runs and scrambles from ~2 to 8 hours long.
The pack is designed to allow quick easy access to essential gear with good weight distribution by putting the water bottles on the front of the vest. Also on the front of the vest are two large electronics pockets, four gel pockets, and two Velcro pockets that fit a small ipod or electrolyte pills. The sides of the vest have a zippered pocket that overlaps a Velcro opening stretch pocket. (These pockets are hard for me to reach and they overlap so if you put much in one the other becomes useless. I cut out the Velcro to make it easier to get things in and out.)
The back of the pack has a 9.2L main compartment built with cuben fiber to stay lightweight. Two zippers are located on the back. One gives access to the main compartment and the other gives access to a small pocket on the very outside (good for quick access small items like snacks or map). The zipper placement and length limits creativity when packing lots or large items into the main compartment. A cord and drawstring on the inside can be used to hold a hydration reservoir in place but I removed it. Another cord and drawstring on the outside of the pack is used to cinch down extra volume or hold a jacket or crampons on the outside of the pack. Loops on the back are for an ice axe.
I have had good luck with packing a LOT of stuff into this bag. Scrambling up Wedge Mt. early in the season I managed to stuff rain pants and jacket, a sandwich, a spare water bottle, gloves, hat, crampons, and an axe into the back and the rest of my food in front pockets. I usually move one of the water bottles to the back to put my camera into the front bottle holder for easy access.
Having bottles up front is awesome. I hate the hassle of a hydration pouch and filling it on the go. With bottles up front you can pull them out anytime to drink or fill in a flash at a stream.
Pros:
- Compared to an equivalent “pack” it is crazy light.
- It can hold as much as you could possibly need for a long run and more.
- The mesh fabric is extremely breathable and though it seems like it would be uncomfortable on bare skin (scratchy) it has never given me any trouble with chaffing even running shirtless.
Cons / What can be improved about this product:
- The downside of the breathable fabric is that anything stored in the main compartment is directly exposed to your sweaty back. So, if you pack a spare dry shirt for when you get to the cool alpine temps after a hot run up the mountain it will be soaked unless you take preventative measures.
- Forget asking a partner to reach in and grab a energy bar for you – gross. Its not really a series drawback but can be annoying.
- I would prefer one of the upper front electronics pockets to be made of cuben fiber to protect an iphone.
- The chest orientation of the water bottles can definitely lead to some bruised feeling ribs. It went away pretty quickly for me but certainly could be annoying/a problem for someone else.
Product Specs:
- Weight: 368 grams
- Cost per Gram: $0.35/g
- Materials: Cuben Fiber and Hex Mesh
- Size: 9.2 L Volume + 2 x 2oz Bottles
Online stores that carry Ultimate Direction Scott Jurek Ultra Vest:
- $124.95 directly from Ultimate Direction
- $149.95 slightly bigger PB Aventure Vest directly from Ultimate Direction
- $120-125 at Amazon.com and $150 for PB Adventure vest
- $125 at Backcountry.com
- $125 at CampSaver.com and $150 for PB Adventure Vest
Eric Carter says
Jeremy: Yeah – It is possible that the little elastic shock cords holding the bottles in your pack are either slipping or have completely come untied. I’ll try to upload a pic but the cord is just tied to a loop and sewn into the top fabric. On both of my packs, both of the bottle holders, both sides have come untied. I used a scissors to cut a slit in the mesh and then retied. If the knots were slipping or were entirely untied, obviously retention would be an issue. It is worth cutting into and trying to tighten. Regardless, the pack is clearly designed to be light, not super durable. I can handle that as long as no one is trying to advertise otherwise.
Stano Faban says
Jeremy, thanks for sharing your experience with the pack! I personally have not tried this one (Eric wrote this review as you can see at the top) but I have tried the Ultimate Direction AK vest couple of times and loved it, no fit issues and bottles were felt quite secure.
Jeremy says
I’ve used this pack regularly since early spring 2013 and my fondness for it has been slowly declining as I’ve used it more. In general it’s a great pack, but it has a few design flaws that make it seem less attractive for use as it ages or starts to see wear. First, I did experience the same rib bruising problem mentioned in your review. I’ve built up a tolerance to it over time, but the bottles do clank around in the same spot for a long time on long runs like the SpeekGoat50k. Second, the lack of a protective pocket for an electronic item on the front side is a bit annoying. I’ve added in a zip-lock bag and that takes care of the problem, but it does seem that could have been included in the original design of the electronic pockets. It makes me wonder a bit about planned obsolecence because I’m sure they’ll debut this feature in future editions of this product. But, what really has been a problem has been ‘sagginess’ that’s occured as this thing has aged. The front water bottle pockets seemed to ride really well the first 5 months or so, but now they seem ever so slightly more saggy each time I use it and the bottles are starting to bang around on me quite considerably. I think the materials used tend to stretch over time and heavy use, and I think it may limit the longevity of this product if you’re using it regularly. Overall though this pack is cut well (for me) holds anything you’d need on a long run or summer traverse and is a great improvement in running pack product design in general. Quibbles on pricepoint and product longevity aside, it’s better than most running packs out there.